<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 75 Books, Book #4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/75-books-book-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/75-books-book-4/</link>
	<description>a blog in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:15:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/75-books-book-4/comment-page-1/#comment-6624</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=2587#comment-6624</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just read &lt;i&gt;Black Swan Green&lt;/i&gt; myself - my reaction is &lt;a href=&quot;http://peake.livejournal.com/62680.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; – and agree that it is ambitious, and also feel that it establishes literary skills that haven&#039;t necessarily been evident in the style of fiction he&#039;s chosen to write before this, notably a sustained narrative voice. But I do wonder whether you are right that it will split readers. Anyone expecting another &lt;i&gt;Cloud  Atlas&lt;/i&gt; will probably be disappointed, but I&#039;m not convinced that many people would be reading him in the expectation that he would repeat himself. Surely the split over &lt;i&gt;Saturday&lt;/i&gt; was largely political rather than literary, and I don&#039;t think the political content of &lt;i&gt;Black Swan Green&lt;/i&gt;, over the Falklands War for instance, would have the same response because it is so clearly filtered through the 13-year-old perspective of the narrator. (Mind you, I saw the political content of &lt;i&gt;Saturday&lt;/i&gt; as McEwan&#039;s way of showing us into the mind of Perowne, but many readers seemed to take it straight.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just read <i>Black Swan Green</i> myself &#8211; my reaction is <a href="http://peake.livejournal.com/62680.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> – and agree that it is ambitious, and also feel that it establishes literary skills that haven&#8217;t necessarily been evident in the style of fiction he&#8217;s chosen to write before this, notably a sustained narrative voice. But I do wonder whether you are right that it will split readers. Anyone expecting another <i>Cloud  Atlas</i> will probably be disappointed, but I&#8217;m not convinced that many people would be reading him in the expectation that he would repeat himself. Surely the split over <i>Saturday</i> was largely political rather than literary, and I don&#8217;t think the political content of <i>Black Swan Green</i>, over the Falklands War for instance, would have the same response because it is so clearly filtered through the 13-year-old perspective of the narrator. (Mind you, I saw the political content of <i>Saturday</i> as McEwan&#8217;s way of showing us into the mind of Perowne, but many readers seemed to take it straight.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
