<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reluctant Habits &#187; Academy Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/category/academy-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com</link>
	<description>a cultural website in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
			<item>
		<title>The Devil and Miss Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/the-devil-and-miss-cody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/the-devil-and-miss-cody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diablo Cody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/the-devil-and-miss-cody/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diablo Cody&#8217;s win over Tamara Jenkins for the Best Original Screenplay Oscar is perhaps the most egregious Oscar victory since Oliver! beat out 2001 for Best Picture in 1968. If...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diablo Cody&#8217;s win over Tamara Jenkins for the Best Original Screenplay Oscar is perhaps the most egregious Oscar victory since <i>Oliver!</i> beat out <i>2001</i> for Best Picture in 1968.  If this were a just universe, the appropriate executives would have taken Cody out behind the shed shortly after reading <i>Juno</i> and shot her down like an old dog.  Instead, the Academy awarded Cody the Oscar for relying upon cultural references over emotional conviction, for using characters who are ironically detached rather than prepared to face the visceral realities of responsibility, and for encouraging Jason Reitman to employ the most insipid use of angst-ridden indie rock in cinema I&#8217;ve seen in some time.  </p>
<p><img src='http://www.edrants.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/diablocody.jpg' alt='diablocody.jpg' align="right" />Let us be clear on this.  I saw all five Best Picture nominees.  And while I liked the other four, it is an outrage that so many thinking people have been duped by <i>Juno</i>.  Ellen Page&#8217;s snarky one-note performance, originating from the same creative morass that spawned such execrable &#8220;wonders&#8221; as <i>Napoleon Dynamite</i>, <i>Little Miss Sunshine</i>, and Wes Anderson&#8217;s films after <i>The Royal Tenenbaums</i>, is considered multilayered and superlative.  Nobody has had the balls to call out Reitman for relying so heavily upon great character actors like Rainn Wilson and Allison Janney to disguise his creative deficiencies.  <i>Juno</i> was nothing more than an extended episode of <i>Arrested Development</i> &#8212; a dreadful film in which such filmmaking tactics as six consecutive cuts of a van driving in front of a suburban house are considered &#8220;clever&#8221; and in which Michael Cera has been encouraged to abdicate his talent in favor of being typecast as the nice guy (and he will most certainly be typecast, if he takes another one of these damnable roles).</p>
<p><i>Juno</i> is a film that would rather have its titular protagonist cry out &#8220;Thundercats, ho!&#8221; while she is going into labor than express anything tantamount to fright or second thoughts.  It is a film content to have Jason Bateman name-check Herschell Gordon Lewis and Sonic Youth instead of having him emote over the difficulties of getting older.  It is a film content with such cheapshots as Jennifer Garner presented as a yuppie mom caricature and another mom (played by Darla Vandenbossche) mocked for being older and overweight.  (In fact, Vandenbossche&#8217;s sole purpose for being in this film is to be ridiculed by Cody.  What does <i>that</i> say about emerging talent?)  This is a film designed for people who do not feel or embrace the world in any genuine way.  With the exception of Juno&#8217;s parents (played by Allison Janney and J.K. Simmons), I felt nothing for any of the characters in this film.  They were uninteresting, solipsistic, and as hackneyed as the flattest of paper dolls.  I was appalled at the film&#8217;s reliance upon artifice over conviction.  Handing over the Oscar to that inarticulate waif Sofia Coppola was one thing.  But giving it to Cody for <i>Juno</i> last night was a true injustice.</p>
<p>The best original screenplay of 2007 &#8212; Tamara Jenkins&#8217;s <i>The Savages</i>, which bristled with emotion and intelligence &#8212; was entirely ignored by both the Academy and the purported streetcred of the Independent Spirit Award for a film phonier than a second-hand Hallmark card.  If awards ceremonies are anything to go by, Hollywood is in trouble.  Homegrown talent can&#8217;t measure up.  Not only is Hollywood awarding its acting laurels to the Europeans, but it now feel content to dismiss any screenwriter who dares to pursue the human heart in conflict with itself.  It&#8217;s the hip adding machines like Cody who now matter.  But despite Cody&#8217;s penchant for taking off her clothes, the naked truth of true emotion eludes her.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fthe-devil-and-miss-cody%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/the-devil-and-miss-cody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The party&#8217;s over</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/the-partys-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/the-partys-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erin O'Brien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But what a party it was, Ed. After a blow-out like that, I&#8217;m sure everyone&#8217;s ready for a laid back weekend. I know I am. Why not read a book?...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what a party it was, Ed. </p>
<p>After a blow-out like that, I&#8217;m sure everyone&#8217;s ready for a laid back weekend. I know I am. Why not read a book? <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1554102707/qid=1127210839/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-2054446-4721564?v=glance&amp;s=books&amp;n=507846">This one</a> is pretty good. <a href="http://shoutinginthedark.blogspot.com/2007/05/harvey-eck-erin-obrien.html">This gentleman</a> thought so. And so did <a href="http://www.barkingaardvark.com/wordpress/?p=1088">this fellow.</a> A bunch of others did I too, but let&#8217;s not get redundant. </p>
<p>Hey! I just jumped over to that Amazon page! You&#8217;d better hurry up and order! There&#8217;s only one left in stock! Oh &#8230; wait a minute &#8230; there&#8217;s more on the way. Everyone can relax. But <i>whew,</i> that was close!</p>
<p>(I used five exclamation points in that last graph!)</p>
<p>Some people don&#8217;t like the cover of that book. Hell of a thing when some chick fools around for years writing and rewriting a cool little book and people sniff at the picture on the cover and don&#8217;t even give it a chance. It&#8217;s sort of like taking a thousand dance lessons, getting pretty good at the mambo, then being forced to wear a dress someone else picked out for the ball that ain&#8217;t so great and spending the evening wandering around the punch bowl. </p>
<p>I know. How about this: I&#8217;ll give you a sample&#8211;just like the lady with the tray of little paper cups at the grocery store. But instead of a tiny hot dog piece (sorry Tao), <a href="http://erin-obrien.blogspot.com/2005/11/lunch-with-crunch.html">here&#8217;s</a> a taste of what&#8217;s inside of the book.</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s all for now. I loved spending time with all of you. Ed, you throw one hell of a bash. </p>
<p>Thanks. </p>
<p>Now if anyone finds my undies (the ones with the zipper) please send them <a href="http://erin-obrien.blogspot.com/2005/10/contact-erin-obrien.html">here.</a></p>
<p>Love,</p>
<p>Erin</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fthe-partys-over%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/the-partys-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Attentions Are Elsewhere</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/my-attentions-are-elsewhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/my-attentions-are-elsewhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, folks, I&#8217;m busy with the Oscar blog this weekend, which even before the ceremony has filled up with some fine posts. We have somewhere around 35 people on tap,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, folks, I&#8217;m busy <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar">with the Oscar blog</a> this weekend, which even before the ceremony has filled up with some fine posts.  We have somewhere around 35 people on tap, including many of the fine folks on the right, Jennifer Weiner, Kelly Link, Jeff VanderMeer, Elizabeth Crane, and countless others.  Plus, predictions from <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar/?p=3">David Kipen</a>, <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar/?p=6">Aimee Bender</a>, and <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar/?p=13">some thoughts from Jonathan Ames</a>.  Even Robert Birnbaum <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar/?p=15">is blogging</a>.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fmy-attentions-are-elsewhere%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/my-attentions-are-elsewhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live Oscar Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/live-oscar-blog-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/live-oscar-blog-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 08:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=2851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Oscar blog is now up, with a list of instigators that will likely expand in the next 48 hours. If you don&#8217;t have a television set, be sure to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar"><img id="image2850" src="http://www.edrants.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/oscarsplash.jpg" alt="oscarsplash.jpg" border=0 /></a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.edrants.com/oscar">Oscar blog</a> is now up, with a list of instigators that will likely expand in the next 48 hours.  If you don&#8217;t have a television set, be sure to check out the commentary.  And do feel free to weigh in via the comments, come Sunday night.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Flive-oscar-blog-2%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/live-oscar-blog-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Items</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/three-items/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/three-items/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=2687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. RIP, Coretta Scott King. 2. Most. Predictable. Nomination List. Ever. (More importantly, the Razzies have been announced. Go Uwe Boll!) 3. If you miss tonight&#8217;s 2006 State of the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  RIP, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/national/31cnd-king.html?hp&#038;ex=1138770000&#038;en=b96894b01d5592c7&#038;ei=5094&#038;partner=homepage">Coretta Scott King</a>.</p>
<p>2.  <a href="http://www.oscars.org/78academyawards/noms.html">Most.  Predictable.  Nomination List.  Ever.</a>  (More importantly, <a href="http://www.razzies.com/default.asp">the Razzies have been announced</a>.  Go Uwe Boll!)</p>
<p>3.  If you miss tonight&#8217;s 2006 State of the Union address, have no fear.  It&#8217;s exactly identical, word for word, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html">to the 2002 State of the Union</a>.  Read the 2002 address and you&#8217;ll hear all you need to know about the State of the Union.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fthree-items%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/three-items/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar Pool</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/the-oscar-pool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/the-oscar-pool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DrMabuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to get into dichotimies, I suspect that there are computer mechanics and car mechanics. There are people who understand and appreciate comics and there are people who...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get into dichotimies, I suspect that there are computer mechanics and car mechanics.  There are people who understand and appreciate comics and there are people who don&#8217;t.  And when it comes to yearly televised fluff (that is, if we have to choose one), there are Oscar people and there are Super Bowl people.  (And if you haven&#8217;t guessed already, I&#8217;m one of the former.)</p>
<p>Some folks in the know <a href="http://www.laweekly.com/ink/05/14/deadline-finke.php">say that Chris Rock&#8217;s career</a> is on the line.  And they may be right.  David Letterman was about as close as mainstream acceptance got to quirky and not even he could cut the mustard.  And isn&#8217;t this the kind of sacrifice that fluff is all about?  If you&#8217;re a running back who blows a reception in the Super Bowl, sure, the fans are going to kick your ass for a month or so and there&#8217;s a good chance you&#8217;re going to get traded.  But if it&#8217;s the Oscars, not only can you not come back (unless, like Billy Crystal, your win-loss record is good), but you could end up thrown into coach.  (Case in point: It may have been a <i>fait accompli</i>, but was it Oscar that fueled Whoopi&#8217;s sad slide into the mediocre world of <i>Hollywood Squares</i>?)</p>
<p>But if you really want to know what keeps me coming, it&#8217;s the gambling pools.  I don&#8217;t bet on football anymore, but with Oscar bets, at least you can create some modest illusion that you&#8217;re throwing around money for something quasi-cultural.  </p>
<p>With this in mind, I unveil my Oscar predictions.  This is not a measure of who <i>should</i> win, but rather who <i>will</i> win.  I&#8217;ve been wrong before, but let it not be said that I didn&#8217;t have flaunt around a crystal ball every now and then.</p>
<p><b>BEST PICTURE:</b>  <i>The Aviator</i></p>
<p>Last year was Eastwood&#8217;s year.  And <i>Million Dollar Baby</i> has had this weird tendency to alienate every female film geek I&#8217;ve talked with.  <i>Sideways</i> is too character-based to win.  Which leaves <i>Finding Neverland</i>, <i>Ray</i> and <i>The Aviator</i> vying for pure spectacle.  And since <i>The Aviator</i> has planes, pathos and explosions (always a firm bet with Academy voters) and this is the second of the Harvey-Marty pairup pictures, my guess is that Marty will win after being denied so many years.</p>
<p><b>BEST DIRECTOR:</b>  Martin Scorsese</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fairly confident this one&#8217;s in the bag.  But if Taylor Hackford wins, then the universe is indeed cruel and without integrity.</p>
<p><b>BEST ACTOR:</b>  Jamie Foxx</p>
<p>He may have extended range, but they won&#8217;t give it to Leo.  <i>Million Dollar Baby</i> was more about Swank than Eastwood.  And Depp needs one more nomination before they give him a Sean Penn.  Which leaves Jamie Foxx and Don Cheadle.  Foxx will win for <i>Ray</i> because the Academy likes a depressing role, though up to a point.</p>
<p><b>BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR:</b>  Thomas Haden Church</p>
<p>This one&#8217;s tough to call.  But I don&#8217;t think the Academy has it in them to give Foxx two Oscars the same year.  Nor do I believe that Alan Alda pulls his weight in with the geriatric vote as much as he used to.  (And, besides, his performance was too spastic.)  Freeman&#8217;s role in <i>Million Dollar Baby</i> was a far cry from <i>Street Smart</i> and, as much as I like Freeman, let&#8217;s face the facts that it was pretty much the same performance he&#8217;s been giving us since <i>The Shawhsank Redemption</i>.  Clive Owen is only a recent find.  But Church has the Paul Giamatti guilt factor going for him, which will have the irony of making Giamatti feel worse for being snubbed if Church wins.  Plus, there&#8217;s always at least one supporting winner that turns out weird.  </p>
<p><b>BEST ACTRESS:</b>  Hilary Swank</p>
<p>Moreno and Staunton have no chance.  Nobody remembers <i>Being Julia</i>.  <i>Eternal Sunshine</i> is too abstract for the major Oscar nominations.  But Hilary Swank has the Tom Hanks thing going.  Everybody likes her.  Plus, there&#8217;s the whole getting-in-shape-for-the-role thing.  Plus, she&#8217;s a solid actor being molded by Eastwood.  </p>
<p><b>BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS:</b>  Cate Blanchett</p>
<p>Never mind that Madsen, Linney and Okonedo all deserve the award.  Blanchett will win by way of giving the crowd-pleasing performance.  And Portman will learn the hard way that taking off her clothes may win points with Internet downloaders, but doesn&#8217;t factor in at all with the Academy.</p>
<p><b>BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY:</b>  <i>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</i></p>
<p>Because only in the writing categories does originality shine.</p>
<p><b>BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY:</b>  <i>Sideways</i></p>
<p>Because Daddy always said, &#8220;Runner up, son, is Best Screenplay.&#8221;</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fthe-oscar-pool%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/the-oscar-pool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Angst Goes to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-angst-goes-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-angst-goes-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DrMabuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Gil Cates is a terrible director (prima facie: Oh God, Book II) and a spotty producer of televised awards ceremonies, and while we wish to make it clear in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Gil Cates is a terrible director (prima facie: <i>Oh God, Book II</i>) and a spotty producer of televised awards ceremonies, and while we wish to make it clear in almost every way that we are not, by and large, Gil Cates fans, we must applaud his efforts <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000800850">to cater to the basest audience impulses</a> by publicly shaming Oscar nominees.  Apparently, Cates&#8217; plans involve having some of the nominees schlep on stage, whereby the winners will step forward while the runner-ups will be forced to stand in darkness.</p>
<p>Walter Murch is the strongest opponent of the plan:  &#8220;To apply some kind of PMI (People magzine index) to the nominees and make this the criterion for whether they get to go onstage or not and speak to the Academy is disgraceful to the Academy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Murchie, love your work on Coppola&#8217;s films and your <i>Touch of Evil</i> restoration, but I got news for you, pal:  The Oscars are <b>all about</b> PMI.  </p>
<p>We applaud this in the most strenuous manner.  Catfights, bad fashion decisions, crudely uttered stump speeches and televised spats are, after all, what the Oscars is all about.  Affluent, well-coiffed and vacant-brained starlets pulling hissy fits when they aren&#8217;t LUVED by the Academy (a term, we might add, which has absolutely no educational or platonic value) are what we watch this silly ceremony for.  Between this and Chris Rock hosting, Cates seems to be gearing us for a fantastic televised shitstorm.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fand-the-angst-goes-to%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-angst-goes-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Nominees Are&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-nominees-are/</link>
		<comments>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-nominees-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DrMabuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nominees have been announced. 1. Spellbound was ignored in the Best Documentary category. 2. Granted, he was fun. But Johnny Depp for Pirates of the Caribbean? 3. The Triplets...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.oscar.com/nominees/nomineelist.html">nominees have been announced</a>.  </p>
<p>1.  <i>Spellbound</i> was ignored in the Best Documentary category.<br />
2.  Granted, he was fun.  But Johnny Depp for <i>Pirates of the Caribbean</i>?<br />
3.  <i>The Triplets of Belleville</i> doesn&#8217;t stand a chance against <i>Finding Nemo</i>.<br />
4.  <i>City of God</i> was a surprise.  It&#8217;s up for cinematography, directing, film editing and writing.  It&#8217;s also a Miramax film.  So it was probably pushed like gangbusters.<br />
5.  A surprise <i>Pollock</i> win a few years ago and now a <i>Mystic River</i> nomination. The Academy really loves Marcia Gay Harden, don&#8217;t they?<br />
6.  Keisha Castle-Hughes for Best Actress in <i>Whale Rider</i>.  She may be the youngest lead nominee ever.  The kids are moving from the Best Supporting nominees (i.e., Anna Paguin for <i>The Piano</i>) to the lead roles.<br />
7.  Typically, the Best Writing category is the sympathy Oscar.  So no surprise to see <i>American Splendor</i>, <i>Dirty Pretty Things</i> and <i>The Barbarian Invasions</i> ghettoized there (although the latter also scored a foreign film nomination).<br />
8.  Alec Baldwin in <i>The Cooler</i> &#8212; another surprise.<br />
9.  I feel sorry for any film up against <i>Return of the King</i> in the technical categories.  It&#8217;s clear they don&#8217;t stand a chance.<br />
10.  <i>A Mighty Wind</i> up for Best Song!</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.edrants.com%2Fand-the-nominees-are%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=80" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.edrants.com/and-the-nominees-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

