<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gone Fishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/</link>
	<description>a blog in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:27:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve come to think of your hiatus announcements as a signal you&#039;re gaining a second wind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to think of your hiatus announcements as a signal you&#8217;re gaining a second wind <img src='http://www.edrants.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwenda</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>gwenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>Oh, man. Now I want to know who you&#039;re talking about.

Take care of yourself and work hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, man. Now I want to know who you&#8217;re talking about.</p>
<p>Take care of yourself and work hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll be here when you get back ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll be here when you get back &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>Hold on there.  I read the PW piece to say the 100 notable books issue comes out &quot;this Sunday&quot;  (12/5), and 10 best books on 12/12.  Meaning, perhaps, they haven&#039;t gone from 100 to 10.  At any rate, my copy of the rulebook says you must have the numbers to hand before withholding any baked goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on there.  I read the PW piece to say the 100 notable books issue comes out &#8220;this Sunday&#8221;  (12/5), and 10 best books on 12/12.  Meaning, perhaps, they haven&#8217;t gone from 100 to 10.  At any rate, my copy of the rulebook says you must have the numbers to hand before withholding any baked goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAAF</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>CAAF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve received my copy, and it&#039;s what Sam says: 100 picks on 12/5, narrowed to 10 on 12/12. 

I will say that the fiction selection is strange: For example, The News From Paraguay isn&#039;t included. The selections were culled, the report says, from the review&#039;s own coverage. Given that their coverage of fiction has been spotty -- it&#039;s not surprising that their idea of &quot;the year&#039;s best&quot; would have significant gaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve received my copy, and it&#8217;s what Sam says: 100 picks on 12/5, narrowed to 10 on 12/12. </p>
<p>I will say that the fiction selection is strange: For example, The News From Paraguay isn&#8217;t included. The selections were culled, the report says, from the review&#8217;s own coverage. Given that their coverage of fiction has been spotty &#8212; it&#8217;s not surprising that their idea of &#8220;the year&#8217;s best&#8221; would have significant gaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B&#178;</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/gone-fishing-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>B&#178;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=1182#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>I agree with Charles above -- when you go on hiatus, it&#039;s actually a good sign, so I too will be waiting for your comeback.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Charles above &#8212; when you go on hiatus, it&#8217;s actually a good sign, so I too will be waiting for your comeback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
