<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff Bezos: Not Even a Dime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/</link>
	<description>a blog in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:15:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: tao</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237193</link>
		<dc:creator>tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237193</guid>
		<description>philanthropy only happens to the extent that it will increase profits, if you are a publicly-owned corporation, so yeah, it is because there wasn&#039;t enough public pressure 

if you are a publicly-owned corporation you exist to increase profits so that investors will gain a return on their investment. if philanthropy will increase profits (by way of better public-image, etc.) then it will happen, if it will not increase profits, it will not happen. 

just support independently owned companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>philanthropy only happens to the extent that it will increase profits, if you are a publicly-owned corporation, so yeah, it is because there wasn&#8217;t enough public pressure </p>
<p>if you are a publicly-owned corporation you exist to increase profits so that investors will gain a return on their investment. if philanthropy will increase profits (by way of better public-image, etc.) then it will happen, if it will not increase profits, it will not happen. </p>
<p>just support independently owned companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237188</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237188</guid>
		<description>Charity begins at home, I guess. And I presume his home is quite exceptional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charity begins at home, I guess. And I presume his home is quite exceptional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marydell</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237184</link>
		<dc:creator>marydell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237184</guid>
		<description>CBO, no, though I do see some merit in laissez-faire capitalism, which does not necessarily preclude philanthropy.

James, I understand.  I personally wouldn&#039;t want to be shamed into acts of charity, so I&#039;m not one to point fingers at others (whether person or corporation).  Besides, Amazon will likely get around to sharing its wealth after the tax consequences of operating in the black start sinking in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBO, no, though I do see some merit in laissez-faire capitalism, which does not necessarily preclude philanthropy.</p>
<p>James, I understand.  I personally wouldn&#8217;t want to be shamed into acts of charity, so I&#8217;m not one to point fingers at others (whether person or corporation).  Besides, Amazon will likely get around to sharing its wealth after the tax consequences of operating in the black start sinking in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237178</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237178</guid>
		<description>Marydell, we&#039;re not talking about what Bezos does personally, but about a corporation.  If it&#039;s going to be granted status as a person under the law, I think expecting it to behave humanely is perfectly reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marydell, we&#8217;re not talking about what Bezos does personally, but about a corporation.  If it&#8217;s going to be granted status as a person under the law, I think expecting it to behave humanely is perfectly reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sampsell</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237177</link>
		<dc:creator>Sampsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237177</guid>
		<description>I think Simonson has a point. Plus, he uses the word &quot;niggardly&quot; which I&#039;ve only seen elsewhere in a Gary Lutz story. It&#039;s a word that, on sight, could be misunderstood, but merely means stingy or cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Simonson has a point. Plus, he uses the word &#8220;niggardly&#8221; which I&#8217;ve only seen elsewhere in a Gary Lutz story. It&#8217;s a word that, on sight, could be misunderstood, but merely means stingy or cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBO</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237175</link>
		<dc:creator>CBO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237175</guid>
		<description>Marydell: Your favorite author doesn&#039;t happen to be Ayn Rand, by any chance, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marydell: Your favorite author doesn&#8217;t happen to be Ayn Rand, by any chance, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marydell</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237173</link>
		<dc:creator>marydell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237173</guid>
		<description>Seriously, is it anyone&#039;s business what Bezos does with his money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, is it anyone&#8217;s business what Bezos does with his money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/jeff-bezos-not-even-a-dime/comment-page-1/#comment-237172</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6630#comment-237172</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  When I worked at Amazon (&#039;97 to &#039;03) some of us suggested corporate giving programs that would tie into the original business of books, such as grants to aspiring writers or at least a literary prize of some kind.  The excuse was always that, although money was coming in hand over fist, the company had yet to turn a profit.  That was true then--only in my last couple of years there did they see the ink begin to turn from black to red.  I&#039;m not sure how consistently profitable they&#039;ve been since I left, but they had an awfully big hole to dig out of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  When I worked at Amazon (&#8217;97 to &#8216;03) some of us suggested corporate giving programs that would tie into the original business of books, such as grants to aspiring writers or at least a literary prize of some kind.  The excuse was always that, although money was coming in hand over fist, the company had yet to turn a profit.  That was true then&#8211;only in my last couple of years there did they see the ink begin to turn from black to red.  I&#8217;m not sure how consistently profitable they&#8217;ve been since I left, but they had an awfully big hole to dig out of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
