<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Racism and Copyright Games: The Fallacious Position of William Sanders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/racism-and-copyright-games-the-fallacious-position-of-william-sanders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/racism-and-copyright-games-the-fallacious-position-of-william-sanders/</link>
	<description>a blog in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:27:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/racism-and-copyright-games-the-fallacious-position-of-william-sanders/comment-page-1/#comment-246579</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 06:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=8036#comment-246579</guid>
		<description>Steven, as someone once wrote on Crooked Timber, when people like this guy talk about Muslims, they&#039;re not thinking of Richard Thompson.  Sanders&#039;s use of the word &quot;sheet-heads&quot; in particular conjures up an image of Arabs and &lt;i&gt;possibly&lt;/i&gt; Central Asians.  And his &quot;I was pleased to see that you didn’t engage in the typical error of trying to make this evil bastard sympathetic, or give him human qualities&quot; shows that he&#039;s a lousy judge of literature as well as a bigot:  I can&#039;t imagine even Orson Scott Card praising a story for not giving its central characters &quot;human qualities.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, as someone once wrote on Crooked Timber, when people like this guy talk about Muslims, they&#8217;re not thinking of Richard Thompson.  Sanders&#8217;s use of the word &#8220;sheet-heads&#8221; in particular conjures up an image of Arabs and <i>possibly</i> Central Asians.  And his &#8220;I was pleased to see that you didn’t engage in the typical error of trying to make this evil bastard sympathetic, or give him human qualities&#8221; shows that he&#8217;s a lousy judge of literature as well as a bigot:  I can&#8217;t imagine even Orson Scott Card praising a story for not giving its central characters &#8220;human qualities.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/racism-and-copyright-games-the-fallacious-position-of-william-sanders/comment-page-1/#comment-246550</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=8036#comment-246550</guid>
		<description>&quot;the worm-brained mentality of those people”?

Maybe he was just confusing it with another submission about hipsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the worm-brained mentality of those people”?</p>
<p>Maybe he was just confusing it with another submission about hipsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Augustine</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/racism-and-copyright-games-the-fallacious-position-of-william-sanders/comment-page-1/#comment-246514</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Augustine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=8036#comment-246514</guid>
		<description>&quot;...take up the dispute in court to collect the dutiful damages that come from being associated with a racist editor.&quot;

I think there&#039;s enough rhetorical demand to justify finding, or inventing, a *precise* word to describe a religion-specific display of prejudice; meanwhile, &quot;racist&quot; ain&#039;t it. We are seriously blunting the force of that adjective by over-using it incorrectly. &quot;Muslim&quot; is not a race and neither is the religion identified with a *particular* race... if it is, please name the race, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;take up the dispute in court to collect the dutiful damages that come from being associated with a racist editor.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s enough rhetorical demand to justify finding, or inventing, a *precise* word to describe a religion-specific display of prejudice; meanwhile, &#8220;racist&#8221; ain&#8217;t it. We are seriously blunting the force of that adjective by over-using it incorrectly. &#8220;Muslim&#8221; is not a race and neither is the religion identified with a *particular* race&#8230; if it is, please name the race, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
