<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/</link>
	<description>a cultural website in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: tombesh</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236793</link>
		<dc:creator>tombesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236793</guid>
		<description>Roger Ebert, at his web site, has a strong rebuttal to Rosenbaum&#039;s tut-tutting of Bergman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert, at his web site, has a strong rebuttal to Rosenbaum&#8217;s tut-tutting of Bergman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236792</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236792</guid>
		<description>The Barthelme news is maybe the best thing I&#039;ve ever read on your blog, Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Barthelme news is maybe the best thing I&#8217;ve ever read on your blog, Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236789</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236789</guid>
		<description>Ed -- the reason I keep bringing it up is that I want you on my bandwagon!  I&#039;m not going to rest until that happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed &#8212; the reason I keep bringing it up is that I want you on my bandwagon!  I&#8217;m not going to rest until that happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alias</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236787</link>
		<dc:creator>Alias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236787</guid>
		<description>You should check out the magazine Adbusters.  Great cutting-edge (if polemical) content, no advertising. Actually anti-advertising, as the title suggests. www.adbusters.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check out the magazine Adbusters.  Great cutting-edge (if polemical) content, no advertising. Actually anti-advertising, as the title suggests. <a href="http://www.adbusters.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.adbusters.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessie</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236786</link>
		<dc:creator>jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236786</guid>
		<description>I like how The Believer puts their TOC on the back cover. But a small word in defense of all those ads - they do indicate a good pay-per-word rate, which is hard to come by for freelancers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how The Believer puts their TOC on the back cover. But a small word in defense of all those ads &#8211; they do indicate a good pay-per-word rate, which is hard to come by for freelancers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236785</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236785</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really upset about the Patriot Act vote - I even know one of the people who voted for it personally. She was a prosecutor, but still. :-p WTF? She&#039;s getting a letter.

I bought a copy of Vogue out of boredom on a weekend roadtrip, and counted the pages it took me to get to the TOC: 52! And the rest of the TOC didn&#039;t follow on the next page, I had to hunt 12 more pages in to get the second part. Damn! I mean really - they can put all those stupid ads in there, but why can&#039;t they move the TOC where we can find it? Perhaps that&#039;s why they put the stupid page numbers on the cover - because nobody can find the TOC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really upset about the Patriot Act vote &#8211; I even know one of the people who voted for it personally. She was a prosecutor, but still. :-p WTF? She&#8217;s getting a letter.</p>
<p>I bought a copy of Vogue out of boredom on a weekend roadtrip, and counted the pages it took me to get to the TOC: 52! And the rest of the TOC didn&#8217;t follow on the next page, I had to hunt 12 more pages in to get the second part. Damn! I mean really &#8211; they can put all those stupid ads in there, but why can&#8217;t they move the TOC where we can find it? Perhaps that&#8217;s why they put the stupid page numbers on the cover &#8211; because nobody can find the TOC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ea</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-167/comment-page-1/#comment-236783</link>
		<dc:creator>ea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=6537#comment-236783</guid>
		<description>The James Wood move seems meaningless to me.  He probably appeared half as many times in The New Yorker each year as he did in TNR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The James Wood move seems meaningless to me.  He probably appeared half as many times in The New Yorker each year as he did in TNR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

