<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/roundup-230/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-230/</link>
	<description>a blog in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:15:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: KXH</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-230/comment-page-1/#comment-245633</link>
		<dc:creator>KXH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=7697#comment-245633</guid>
		<description>Obama has an election to win, which I think will be impossible without his pandering to some conservative perspectives from time to time. 

The thing that interests me about a possible Obama presedency is that it would reveal the extent to which the role of President is a pre-scripted effect of a system of advisors, handlers, experts, conventions, and so forth. 

That he &#039;moves to the center&#039; during the campaign wouldn&#039;t bother me. But - if this brilliant black man with a background in working on inner city poverty does not substantially challenge the right-wing orientation of the state, it will prove that we&#039;re voting for the same guy everytime, no matter what. (And - that Ralph Nader, while a figure of fun, is basically right.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has an election to win, which I think will be impossible without his pandering to some conservative perspectives from time to time. </p>
<p>The thing that interests me about a possible Obama presedency is that it would reveal the extent to which the role of President is a pre-scripted effect of a system of advisors, handlers, experts, conventions, and so forth. </p>
<p>That he &#8216;moves to the center&#8217; during the campaign wouldn&#8217;t bother me. But &#8211; if this brilliant black man with a background in working on inner city poverty does not substantially challenge the right-wing orientation of the state, it will prove that we&#8217;re voting for the same guy everytime, no matter what. (And &#8211; that Ralph Nader, while a figure of fun, is basically right.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Augustine</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-230/comment-page-1/#comment-245482</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Augustine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=7697#comment-245482</guid>
		<description>Re: the very good Diski piece: leave it to a cynic to get to the heart of the matter and tell some truth. Which illustrates why cynics (while not, perhaps, being the best choices for manning suicide hotlines) make the best writers: Candides and Pollyannas need not apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the very good Diski piece: leave it to a cynic to get to the heart of the matter and tell some truth. Which illustrates why cynics (while not, perhaps, being the best choices for manning suicide hotlines) make the best writers: Candides and Pollyannas need not apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
