<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/roundup-234/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-234/</link>
	<description>a cultural website in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/03/08 &#171; Enter the Octopus</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-234/comment-page-1/#comment-245709</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt&#8217;s Bookosphere 7/03/08 &#171; Enter the Octopus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=7718#comment-245709</guid>
		<description>[...] Round &#8216;em up, Mr. Champion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Round &#8216;em up, Mr. Champion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Augustine</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/roundup-234/comment-page-1/#comment-245690</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Augustine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=7718#comment-245690</guid>
		<description>Re: Morgan Freeman

&quot;Because he comes across as authoritative?&quot;

More because he&#039;s neuter; sexual neutrality, in  Hollywood code, reads as benevolence and wisdom. Jackson isn&#039;t neuter (though his sexual activity, in most of the films I&#039;ve seen him in, is only implicit), which is why he&#039;s the first choice when they need a dangerous black man (funny or not) for the part. (Wesley Snipes is too black and too dangerous and unavailable, in any case).

Be interesting to do a close-reading on black male actors of note and how they fit in the picture: a psychosexual map of American racial morality. Also interesting how Chiwetel Ejiofor has seemingly escaped the taxonomy by being British.

Next question: do you suppose Will Smith is already in talks to play Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Morgan Freeman</p>
<p>&#8220;Because he comes across as authoritative?&#8221;</p>
<p>More because he&#8217;s neuter; sexual neutrality, in  Hollywood code, reads as benevolence and wisdom. Jackson isn&#8217;t neuter (though his sexual activity, in most of the films I&#8217;ve seen him in, is only implicit), which is why he&#8217;s the first choice when they need a dangerous black man (funny or not) for the part. (Wesley Snipes is too black and too dangerous and unavailable, in any case).</p>
<p>Be interesting to do a close-reading on black male actors of note and how they fit in the picture: a psychosexual map of American racial morality. Also interesting how Chiwetel Ejiofor has seemingly escaped the taxonomy by being British.</p>
<p>Next question: do you suppose Will Smith is already in talks to play Obama?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

