<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Anders &amp; Annalee Newitz (BSS #104)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/segundo/bss-104-charlie-anders-annalee-newitz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/bss-104-charlie-anders-annalee-newitz/</link>
	<description>A cultural podcast in tenebrous standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana de Campos</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/bss-104-charlie-anders-annalee-newitz/comment-page-1/#comment-386399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana de Campos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=127#comment-386399</guid>
		<description>“Well, but women just don’t have the spatial sense. Women can’t rotate five-dimensional objects in their sleep the way men can.” 

I only wanted to point this as what I think is the perfect example of how irrational and simply dumb a stereotype can be and still have people proclaiming it as a fact.

Because seriously, ;) , rotate a five dimensional object in your sleep? That&#039;s doubly absurd since it&#039;s hard to even conceive of a four dimensional object, to consciously evoke in our minds a rough image of it, we need to trace analogies to third and second dimensional objects. Then the absurd of expecting someone to actually ROTATE a 5, not 4, but 5, dimensional one when they&#039;re sleeping.

http://evolutionezine.com/how-to-imagine-a-4-dimensional-object-in-our-3d-world/

Maria Gaetana Agnesi
Hypatia of Alexandria
Julia Bowman Robinson
Amalie Emmy Noether
Sophie Germain

These are 5 examples of great female mathematicians, yet in school a teacher won&#039;t talk about them. Women are not mentioned for their accomplishments as a rule of thumb, there is no reason to not mention Hypatia when talking about philosophers of Greece. Or Bowman alongside of Galois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Well, but women just don’t have the spatial sense. Women can’t rotate five-dimensional objects in their sleep the way men can.” </p>
<p>I only wanted to point this as what I think is the perfect example of how irrational and simply dumb a stereotype can be and still have people proclaiming it as a fact.</p>
<p>Because seriously, <img src='http://www.edrants.com/segundo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  , rotate a five dimensional object in your sleep? That&#8217;s doubly absurd since it&#8217;s hard to even conceive of a four dimensional object, to consciously evoke in our minds a rough image of it, we need to trace analogies to third and second dimensional objects. Then the absurd of expecting someone to actually ROTATE a 5, not 4, but 5, dimensional one when they&#8217;re sleeping.</p>
<p><a href="http://evolutionezine.com/how-to-imagine-a-4-dimensional-object-in-our-3d-world/" rel="nofollow">http://evolutionezine.com/how-to-imagine-a-4-dimensional-object-in-our-3d-world/</a></p>
<p>Maria Gaetana Agnesi<br />
Hypatia of Alexandria<br />
Julia Bowman Robinson<br />
Amalie Emmy Noether<br />
Sophie Germain</p>
<p>These are 5 examples of great female mathematicians, yet in school a teacher won&#8217;t talk about them. Women are not mentioned for their accomplishments as a rule of thumb, there is no reason to not mention Hypatia when talking about philosophers of Greece. Or Bowman alongside of Galois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

