<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave White (BSS #166)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/segundo/dave-white-bss-166/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/dave-white-bss-166/</link>
	<description>A cultural podcast in tenebrous standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Krewer</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/dave-white-bss-166/comment-page-1/#comment-65794</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Krewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=221#comment-65794</guid>
		<description>Why does the Young Roving Correspondent point out the smallest details that have absolutely no impact on how the story flows or is delivered?  

He seems to be harping on these minute points and criticizing Mr. White&#039;s research, yet he himself didn&#039;t look into facts for his own interview.  IE: Taylor Ham, the quality of Swiss Army Knives,  or generalizing that all Jersey women hate Bruce Springsteen.

Also he really has a problem with Bill Martin&#039;s motivation, doesn&#039;t he?.  Why would you want him to veer away from his obsession?  Would you want him to start talking about his interest in Swarovski crystals?  Of course not, it&#039;s impertinent and would add nothing whatsoever.      

I just think an interviewer should never be hypocritical.  Jackson Donne is a lazy PI and you are a lazy interviewer.  I also think an interviewer should never try to overshadow the interview by flaunting an attempt at being witty.  Finally, self-absorbtion has no place in an interview.  The interviewer obviously thinks himself &quot;to cool for school&quot;.  It&#039;s obtrusive and ruined the entire listening experience for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the Young Roving Correspondent point out the smallest details that have absolutely no impact on how the story flows or is delivered?  </p>
<p>He seems to be harping on these minute points and criticizing Mr. White&#8217;s research, yet he himself didn&#8217;t look into facts for his own interview.  IE: Taylor Ham, the quality of Swiss Army Knives,  or generalizing that all Jersey women hate Bruce Springsteen.</p>
<p>Also he really has a problem with Bill Martin&#8217;s motivation, doesn&#8217;t he?.  Why would you want him to veer away from his obsession?  Would you want him to start talking about his interest in Swarovski crystals?  Of course not, it&#8217;s impertinent and would add nothing whatsoever.      </p>
<p>I just think an interviewer should never be hypocritical.  Jackson Donne is a lazy PI and you are a lazy interviewer.  I also think an interviewer should never try to overshadow the interview by flaunting an attempt at being witty.  Finally, self-absorbtion has no place in an interview.  The interviewer obviously thinks himself &#8220;to cool for school&#8221;.  It&#8217;s obtrusive and ruined the entire listening experience for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

