Comments on: Michio Kaku (BSS #197) http://www.edrants.com/segundo/michio-kaku-bss-197/ A cultural podcast in tenebrous standing Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: "Subway" -by Edward Champion | spur-line.com http://www.edrants.com/segundo/michio-kaku-bss-197/comment-page-1/#comment-152839 "Subway" -by Edward Champion | spur-line.com Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:58:00 +0000 http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=304#comment-152839 [...] David Mitchell (interview #1, #2 Pt. 1 and #2 Pt. 2), Nam Le, David Lynch, Kiyoshi Kurosawa, Michio Kaku, Paul Schrader, Thomas M. Disch, Chimamanda Adichie and Naomi [...] [...] David Mitchell (interview #1, #2 Pt. 1 and #2 Pt. 2), Nam Le, David Lynch, Kiyoshi Kurosawa, Michio Kaku, Paul Schrader, Thomas M. Disch, Chimamanda Adichie and Naomi [...]

]]> By: Vertner Vergon http://www.edrants.com/segundo/michio-kaku-bss-197/comment-page-1/#comment-138746 Vertner Vergon Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:06:53 +0000 http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=304#comment-138746 I have seen you on TV. In all due respect you are misinforming the public re relativity. Dear Prof. Kaku I offer you my paper, "Errors of Special Relativity" that displays a proof where SR is defunct. Take, for example, time dilation. According to SR a clock in the approach mode runs slower than proper time. However this is not so empirically. An atomic clock in approach exhibets a (Doppler effect) faster frequency -- in short it registers time faster than proper. So Einstein's time dilation is incorrect. The correct time variation is Doppler time. If you would lik a copy of my paper just request it. Best regards Vertner Vergon vertvergon@gmail.com I have seen you on TV. In all due respect you are misinforming the public re relativity.

Dear Prof. Kaku

I offer you my paper, “Errors of Special Relativity” that displays a proof where SR is defunct.

Take, for example, time dilation. According to SR a clock in the approach mode runs slower than proper time.

However this is not so empirically. An atomic clock in approach exhibets a (Doppler effect) faster frequency — in short it registers time faster than proper. So Einstein’s time dilation is incorrect.

The correct time variation is Doppler time.

If you would lik a copy of my paper just request it.

Best regards

Vertner Vergon

vertvergon@gmail.com

]]> By: para sayma makinesi http://www.edrants.com/segundo/michio-kaku-bss-197/comment-page-1/#comment-102197 para sayma makinesi Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:51:49 +0000 http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=304#comment-102197 Albert Einstein's contribution to physics was perhaps not quite what the layman usually thinks it was.Abert Einstein was asked to poseso many times that he said if he hadn't been a physicist, he could havemade a living as a model. Albert Einstein was the most famous and influential scientist of the twentieth century; his discoveries transformed both the world itself and our understanding of it. " -- Albert Einstein"So long as they don't get violent, I want to let everyone say whatthey wish, for I myself have always said exactly what pleased me. Albert Einstein’s contribution to physics was perhaps not quite what the layman usually thinks it was.Abert Einstein was asked to poseso many times that he said if he hadn’t been a physicist, he could havemade a living as a model. Albert Einstein was the most famous and influential scientist of the twentieth century; his discoveries transformed both the world itself and our understanding of it. ” — Albert Einstein”So long as they don’t get violent, I want to let everyone say whatthey wish, for I myself have always said exactly what pleased me.

]]>