<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BEA 2006 Part 2 (BSS #43)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-43/</link>
	<description>A cultural podcast in tenebrous standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; Sam Tanenhaus: Man Enough or Just Plain Spent?</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-43/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; Sam Tanenhaus: Man Enough or Just Plain Spent?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=61#comment-226</guid>
		<description>[...] Why can&#8217;t Tanenhaus be honest and confess that the NYTBR has willfully abdicated its status as a cultural arbiter? Must Tanenhaus hide behind a comic book escutcheon and a cod piece instead of welcoming conversation (such as editors like the LATBR&#8217;s David Ulin, an antipodean palliative to Tanenhaus if ever there were one; you can listen to his approach to editing on The Bat Segundo Show #43)? Or does it really boil down to a humorless dictatorial swagger? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why can&#8217;t Tanenhaus be honest and confess that the NYTBR has willfully abdicated its status as a cultural arbiter? Must Tanenhaus hide behind a comic book escutcheon and a cod piece instead of welcoming conversation (such as editors like the LATBR&#8217;s David Ulin, an antipodean palliative to Tanenhaus if ever there were one; you can listen to his approach to editing on The Bat Segundo Show #43)? Or does it really boil down to a humorless dictatorial swagger? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booksquare &#187; The Daily Square - Television Is Good Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-43/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Booksquare &#187; The Daily Square - Television Is Good Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=61#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] The Bat Segundo Show #43As the Bat continues to wrap-up his BEA experience, he shares no less than the future of publishing with the world. Lured into the bat cave were: Chad Post, Dennis Loy Johnson, Laura Kellner, Judith Recke, Eleanor Herman, David Ulin, Cary Goldstein, and E [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Bat Segundo Show #43As the Bat continues to wrap-up his BEA experience, he shares no less than the future of publishing with the world. Lured into the bat cave were: Chad Post, Dennis Loy Johnson, Laura Kellner, Judith Recke, Eleanor Herman, David Ulin, Cary Goldstein, and E [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

