<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colson Whitehead (BSS #48)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/</link>
	<description>A cultural podcast in tenebrous standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiction Writers Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who We Are Now: A Conversation with Colson Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/comment-page-1/#comment-386010</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiction Writers Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who We Are Now: A Conversation with Colson Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=66#comment-386010</guid>
		<description>[...] (April 24, 2009); in the New York Review of Books (after Apex Hides the Hurt in 2006); on the Bat Segundo Show (2006): 45 minute podcast; with Powell&#8217;s (after John Henry Days, 2001); with Salon (after The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (April 24, 2009); in the New York Review of Books (after Apex Hides the Hurt in 2006); on the Bat Segundo Show (2006): 45 minute podcast; with Powell&#8217;s (after John Henry Days, 2001); with Salon (after The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiction Writers Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sag Harbor, by Colson Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/comment-page-1/#comment-385999</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiction Writers Review &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sag Harbor, by Colson Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=66#comment-385999</guid>
		<description>[...] (April 24, 2009); in the New York Review of Books (after Apex Hides the Hurt in 2006); on the Bat Segundo Show (2006): 45 minute podcast; with Powell&#8217;s (after John Henry Days, 2001); with Salon (after The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (April 24, 2009); in the New York Review of Books (after Apex Hides the Hurt in 2006); on the Bat Segundo Show (2006): 45 minute podcast; with Powell&#8217;s (after John Henry Days, 2001); with Salon (after The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; 75 Books, Books #55-60</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/comment-page-1/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Champion&#8217;s Return of the Reluctant &#187; 75 Books, Books #55-60</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=66#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>[...] Book #55 was a reread of Colson Whitehead&#8217;s The Intuitionist. I had read this book at the turn of the century, which seemed fitting given this novel&#8217;s preoccupation with the 20th, and marveled then at how Whitehead&#8217;s use of language served as a skeleton key that sometimes opened doors containing keen observations about racism and sexism. Now that I&#8217;m dwelling upon my reread at year&#8217;s end, I&#8217;m thinking that if Tom LeClair can categorize the early work of Richard Powers, William T. Vollmann and David Foster Wallace as &#8220;prodigious fiction,&#8221; perhaps Colson Whitehead might be part of a second wave of &#8220;prodigious fiction&#8221; &#8212; a list that might also include Scarlett Thomas. Certainly, taxonomy is as much of a concern in The Intuitionist as it is to this hypothetical &#8220;first wave,&#8221; particularly the propriety (or lack thereof) we see with the two warring schools of elevator inspectors: the Intuitionists and the Empiricists. But I believe Whitehead is more concerned with how this arranged information affects existence, as opposed to how it is contained within existence, of which more anon. (Podcast interview.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Book #55 was a reread of Colson Whitehead&#8217;s The Intuitionist. I had read this book at the turn of the century, which seemed fitting given this novel&#8217;s preoccupation with the 20th, and marveled then at how Whitehead&#8217;s use of language served as a skeleton key that sometimes opened doors containing keen observations about racism and sexism. Now that I&#8217;m dwelling upon my reread at year&#8217;s end, I&#8217;m thinking that if Tom LeClair can categorize the early work of Richard Powers, William T. Vollmann and David Foster Wallace as &#8220;prodigious fiction,&#8221; perhaps Colson Whitehead might be part of a second wave of &#8220;prodigious fiction&#8221; &#8212; a list that might also include Scarlett Thomas. Certainly, taxonomy is as much of a concern in The Intuitionist as it is to this hypothetical &#8220;first wave,&#8221; particularly the propriety (or lack thereof) we see with the two warring schools of elevator inspectors: the Intuitionists and the Empiricists. But I believe Whitehead is more concerned with how this arranged information affects existence, as opposed to how it is contained within existence, of which more anon. (Podcast interview.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pad</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/segundo/the-bat-segundo-show-48/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Pad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/segundo/?p=66#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Love this interview.... Colson Whitehead is great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this interview&#8230;. Colson Whitehead is great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

