<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lesser of Two Evils?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edrants.com/the-lesser-of-two-evils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edrants.com/the-lesser-of-two-evils/</link>
	<description>a cultural website in ever-shifting standing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Lesser</title>
		<link>http://www.edrants.com/the-lesser-of-two-evils/comment-page-1/#comment-27437</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Lesser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edrants.com/?p=3654#comment-27437</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made a posting on the Elegant Variation site to explain the deletion.  As for the odd structure of my blog in the first place: well, I guess I didn&#039;t think there was a great need for yet another place where everyone could vent their opinions in front of everyone.  I kind of hoped for a more intimate level of response, in the form of email and such, whereby criticism and discussion and agreement and disagreement could be carried out in a private context and not under the eye of the ever-reacting public.  But then, perhaps I was wrong to call it a blog at all.  Still, it seems to me that the definition is not yet frozen in stone (as another communicant in this controversy put it), and therefore my weird version of a blog should count as one too.  But what do I know?
--Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made a posting on the Elegant Variation site to explain the deletion.  As for the odd structure of my blog in the first place: well, I guess I didn&#8217;t think there was a great need for yet another place where everyone could vent their opinions in front of everyone.  I kind of hoped for a more intimate level of response, in the form of email and such, whereby criticism and discussion and agreement and disagreement could be carried out in a private context and not under the eye of the ever-reacting public.  But then, perhaps I was wrong to call it a blog at all.  Still, it seems to me that the definition is not yet frozen in stone (as another communicant in this controversy put it), and therefore my weird version of a blog should count as one too.  But what do I know?<br />
&#8211;Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

