Writers With Drinks

I’m happy to announce that I’ll be reading at Writers With Drinks on December 9, 2006 January 20, 2007 at The Make-Out Room. I’m honored to be included with such fine company as Lolly Winston, Stephen Elliott, Indigo Moor, Laura Moriarty and Kevin Avery. If you’re in San Francisco, do come on by and join the fun!

[UPDATE: There’s been a change in plans. I’ll be appearing at the January 20, 2007 Writers With Drinks instead. Apologies for any inconvenience.]

The Critical Acumen of Amazon Reader Reviews

Richard Ford’s Lay of the Land:

“After reading several pages of this book I encountered a gross insult to the President. This after other negative references to conservatives. Fine. I chose to return the book and exchange it for a copy of Mark Steyn’s America Alone. Mr. Ford, go sit with the Dixie Chicks.”

Anna Quindlen’s Rise and Shine:

“When Anna Quindlen was interviewed on TV, she said that most people think that their child’s teacher is more important than a rock star. Her book is a nice projection of that view. It is also well-written and entertaining.
I am giving 3 copies to friends as gifts.”

Kiran Desai’s The Inheritance of Loss:

“Terrible and pretentious writing. I tried to read this book without much luck. If you have trouble sleeping, this is the perfect sleeping pill.”

Richard Powers’ The Echo Maker:

“Way way too much science at the expense of what could have been a great story about the vanishing cranes. I read a lot of excellent literature but this book taxed my brain and not in a good way. I was sick of all the characters by books end. There was not one redeeming quality in any of them. I simply cannot imagine how this book could win any awards.”

Mark Z. Danielewski’s Only Revolutions:

“ummm…started it…put it down…one of these days ill pick it up…but you really need to devote a ton of time to get thru the upwards and downwards and backwards and forwards… I dont know, Ill take Steven King’s books over these any day.”

Summarizing Rachel Donadio

Hi, I’m Rachel Donadio and I’m working off of the literary feud article boilerplate. Let’s see. Mailer. Mailer. Rushdie-Updike. Tom Wolfe. You know the drill. Don’t mention Queenan-Jacobs because Sam LOVES Queenan! He is a friend! A friend of the NYTBR! Also, the blogosphere is evil but I have no examples to prove my point. (Sorry about that. I just needed another dig at those evil litbloggers because clearly the NYTBR is superior.) This has been a 1,400 word essay that has covered the basics because Sam and I really resent the reading public.