For What It’s Worth

Hmmm, I don’t know how “Franzen’s no fun” equates to “Franzen’s a jerk.” I certainly didn’t say the latter to this individual. But unlike this individual, I won’t use modifiers here. I’ll let listeners judge for themselves whether the encounter was a “toxic provocation.”

© 2007, Edward Champion. All rights reserved.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May Barber
May Barber
17 years ago

Judging for myself, “toxic provocation,” no. Weird and awkward, yes Not clear what Franzen should or could’ve done to be “fun” with the approach.

Mark
Mark
17 years ago

Ummmmm Ron is pretty weird himself. HOT AUTHOR contest anyone?????

Sarah
17 years ago

I was waiting for Franzen’s rendition of “shave and a haircut, two bits”.

Jon Hilderman
Jon Hilderman
17 years ago

In my opinion, Franzen definitely overreacted (one could argue he was being a jerk…), as part of attending such events/being Franzen is dealing with the media.

But… Ed did come across as a little manic/unapproachable, and however much of an asshole he was being, the man had a bit of a point.

James
James
17 years ago

Silly question maybe, but where did the “toxic provocation” quote come from? From the audio clip (and previous experience) I think Franzen is a bit of a stiff, and Ed does come on a bit too strong in the exchange, but who’s blowing this up into something more?

Steven Augustine
17 years ago

Wait…was my original comment deleted because I invoked “Evil Kirk”…or because I invoked “Good Kirk”?

James
James
17 years ago

It wasn’t deleted. It’s on the other thread.

leon
leon
17 years ago

I believe you were browbeating Franzen a little unfairly, Ed. Now come on, that’s not very nice.

Jeff
17 years ago

Jesus H., if a writer can’t take a little interviewing from his adoring public, then why show up? It’s not like he has anything on the line. Nice to know Hogan can remain objective.

Steven Augustine
17 years ago

Emboldened by the realisation that my “Evil Kirk” comment wasn’t deleted, I’ll go even further and suggest that that wasn’t Jonathan Franzen at all, and that Ed’s powers of ventriloquism are so frighteningly polished that he managed to make the “two” voices overlap. But, come on, it’s obvious that both those voices were Ed. No way in hell a millionaire *really talks like that*.

flem
flem
17 years ago

I just hope we can put this whole mess behind us and get back to the important content – Photoshopped pictures of talking cats.

Melissa
Melissa
17 years ago

Sorry, Ed, but you come across as sort of a creepy jerk on that clip. Franzen may not be the nicest person in the world, but you come off as far, far worse in that exchange than he does.