It think Mr. Ford will either knock the ball out of the park with “Lay of the Land” or else be inviting up reviewers to get their umbrellas out. What he’s doing with this book is tricky. It’s set roughly a year before 9/11, and he’s very interested–as the New Yorker excerpt attests–in addressing the pre-attack. For instance, Clare Suddruth’s philosophical question to Bascombe, “Do you imagine, Frank, that anything could happen in this country to make just normal not be possible again?” strikes me as perhaps a bit too much. It’s one thing to have a character say something that turns out to be prophetic. Things like that happen in life all the time. But this idea of a irretrievable “normal” in the the U.S. is a consciousness that became generally evident only after September 11. Thoughts?
It think Mr. Ford will either knock the ball out of the park with “Lay of the Land” or else be inviting up reviewers to get their umbrellas out. What he’s doing with this book is tricky. It’s set roughly a year before 9/11, and he’s very interested–as the New Yorker excerpt attests–in addressing the pre-attack. For instance, Clare Suddruth’s philosophical question to Bascombe, “Do you imagine, Frank, that anything could happen in this country to make just normal not be possible again?” strikes me as perhaps a bit too much. It’s one thing to have a character say something that turns out to be prophetic. Things like that happen in life all the time. But this idea of a irretrievable “normal” in the the U.S. is a consciousness that became generally evident only after September 11. Thoughts?