“American creative energy has always teetered on the brink of insanity. ‘Rhapsody in Blue’ and ‘The Night Chicago Died’ have, alas, common DNA, the DNA for ‘joyfully reckless confidence.’ What I propose as an antidote is simply: awareness of the Megaphonic tendency, and discussion of same. Every well-thought-out rebuttal to dogma, every scrap of intelligent logic, every absurdist reduction of some bullying stance is the antidote. Every request for the clarification of the vague, every poke at smug banality, every pen stroke in a document under revision is the antidote. This battle, like any great moral battle, will be won, if won, not with some easy corrective tidal wave of Total Righteousness, but with small drops of specificity and aplomb and correct logic, delivered titrationally, by many of us all at once.”
– George Saunders, title essay from The Braindead Megaphone

Angelmaker by Nick Harkaway: Harkaway's latest novel greatly improves on his previous book, The Gone-Away World, which I'm already on record as praising. Angelmaker adopts genre elements without ever feeling like a genre book, and it leads me to believe that Harkaway is well on his way to a narrative grace close to China MiƩville's. Yet inexplicably this very fun book, which includes an eightysomething badass named Edie Banister, a mysterious mechanical object that may destroy the world, farcical scenarios involving lawyers and the police, and some unexpectedly moving moments about fatherhood, doesn't appear to be getting much attention in American newspapers. Nothing from the snobs at The New York Times Book Review, nothing from The Washington Post. And since I can't get Harkaway on Bat Segundo, I hope this Jump Up and Down mention gets you hopping as well.
The Age of Insight by Eric Kandel: Unless you're really pressed for time, forget Jonah Lehrer. If you want to understand creativity and its relationship to neuroscience, then the bowtie-wearing Nobel laureate is your man. In addition to being a physically beautiful book (you will drool over many of the paintings), there are helpful overviews on optical illusions, science, biographical backgrounds, and many vital figures from the Vienna Secession. Kandel's enthusiasm (and his call for greater unity between the humanities and science) is contagious.
“Moral battle”? What a huge tool.
How pray tell is George Saunders a tool? Because he writes for the New Yorker? Because he’s a MacArthur genius grant? I’m genuinely curious.
It’s tough to call “tool” off of such a short passage, but as someone who has progressively enjoyed Saunders’ writing less and less (though I would put CivilWarLand in my top 5 books), this bit sends some off the rails warning signals for me. It’s got that liberal scold tone that’s just totally distasteful, even to a liberal (which I believe myself to be). I remember Saunders’ tsk-tsking over the Borat movie too, and his take was just preachy and lame. That novella, something, Phil, something, that tried to lampoon totalitariansim had a core about as deep as Free to Be You and Me and was an embarassment his publisher should’ve quashed.
Seems like he might have caught Young Foagy Syndrome, though lord knows I’ll be picking up the book.