New York Press: “Who knew the women of public radio were so attractive?”
Who Knew the Male Book Reviewers of New York Were So Sexist?
– April 19, 2006Posted in: Book Reviewing, Sexism
Books To Jump Up and Down Over
The Call by Yannick Murphy: The always interesting author of Here They Come and Signed, Mata Hari returns with a novel that whips up a worldview from a rather quirky set of limitations: namely, the call logs that a veterinarian maintains as his son is unexpectedly put into a coma and an unforgiving economy denies him work. What emerges is a surprisingly optimistic, often funny, and very moving account on how one family uses acceptance and forgiveness as a way to atone for hard knocks. (Bat Segundo interview with Murphy)
Birds of Paradise by Diana Abu-Jaber: Forget Franzen and Eugenides. If you're looking for a social novel that counts, Diana Abu-Jaber is the author you're looking for. Building from the free-form exploration of consciousness and identity in Crescent and the gripping procedural structure of Origin, Abu-Jaber's latest novel is her finest, equally fluent with gutterpunk culture and smarmy real estate men. It has been suggested by The Washington Post's Ron Charles that you will likely gain some pounds while reading this novel. This is certainly true. Abu-Jaber's description of food is so precise that it often made me want to do more cooking. But I very much admired the way in which Abu-Jaber presents all her characters as unwitting victims of rough capitalism, which permits them some dignity even as they perform terrible acts.
The Last of the Live Nude Girls by Sheila McClear: This memoir isn't so much about the decline of the Times Square peepshow, as it is about one young woman's efforts to pull herself up by by her bootstraps when presented with few economic options. Filled with self-introspective candor and a quiet dignity, McClear's story is one that might befall any of us in these volatile times. While McClear does get back on her feet, her book leads one contemplating the terrible fates of other young women now moving to New York and falling into deadlier vocations. (Bat Segundo interview with McClear)
Not to be a pest, but the article seems to be picking on the author of the book being reviewed for speding so much time describing the physical attributes of the radio personalities she is profliing. I don’t think the New York Press is sexist for pointing out the oddness of these descriptions.
Or maybe I missed the joke you were going for . . .
A fair enough point, Kevin. And I had certainly considered that. But it seems to me that the reviewer is just as equally rapt with the physical descriptions as the author. Why was the whole review devoted to this and not, say, the depth and quality of Lisa Phillips’ coverage? Normally, this sort of quibble is confined to a few paragraphs, not the entire length of the review.