- I couldn’t agree more. I couldn’t agree less. I’m into subject-verb agreement, but when it comes to silly idioms, it’s something of a mess.
- Is James Wood “brutal?” There’s been a lengthy post on the subject of literary criticism sitting in my drafts folder for quite some time. But I look forward to reading Garth’s promised essay.
- Be wary of telecommunications giants. They now possess a good deal of power over your privacy. (via Isak)
- It would appear that print film critics are having problems as well.
- Big Bad Blog lists some favorite distinct untranslatable word, but appears to have forgotten “bukkake.”
- Tata Stuff.
- HarperCollins will be tinkering around with iPhones.
Author / Edward Champion
BSS #127: Michelle Richmond
Condition of Mr. Segundo: Stumbling upon 21st century technologies.
Author: Michelle Richmond
Subjects Discussed: The relationship of research to plotting, author character qualities and protagonist character qualities, Alabama, San Francisco landmarks, the Richmond District, emasculated men who live in restored Victorians, using simple character names, writing in multiple short chapters, contrapuntal searching, disappearances, beaches and sand dollars, waves and warning signs at Ocean Beach, surfing, photography, on how location influences emotional experience of character, days and calendaring, forensic artists, and the Year of Fog audio book.
EXCERPT FROM SHOW:
Richmond: I’ve written a lot about Alabama. I haven’t lived there in — I don’t know, eighteen years. But I can’t seem to entirely get it out of my system. So this is my first book that was really separate from my upbringing, but yet there’s a tiny bit of that Gulf Coast stuff sprinkled in there. Since that’s where she’s from.
Listen: Play in new window | Download
In Which I Encounter My Nemesis
At last night’s book launch party for Kate Christensen’s The Great Man, I observed a bald man — much shorter than I had expected — resembling a certain journalist working for Time Magazine. It was none other than Lev Grossman, my proud nemesis. Lev had been wiser than me in maintaining his bald form. I had allowed my hair to grow back, complete with its ridiculously receding hairline, after a brief experimental phase in which I had forgotten to acquire a drug habit or transform into some consciously ironic Williamsburg hipster, but that mostly involved seeing if I could effect some bald badass corporeal form with ridiculously cherubic cheeks. The experiment, alas, had mixed results, particularly since I had laryngitis during most of my hairless stint and because Daniel Mendelsohn had confused my lack of voice with a diffident stance. And I remain convinced that I could beat Mr. Mendelsohn in an aggressive game of ping-pong or Connect Four. But no matter. This is unnecessary bravado, but it must be set down for the record. I know I can win. I do plan to revisit this hairless approach later, perhaps when I am feeling more masculine or I have just eaten twenty pounds of raw ground chunk and jogged six times around Prospect Park and I have shouted Hemingway passages at the top of my lungs.
Anyway, Lev was there. And I introduced myself as his nemesis. It took three attempts before he figured out who I was.
“Ed?” he said, unaware that I had moved to New York.
It turns out that he lives not far from me, that he genuinely likes William Gibson (I quizzed him on Count Zero), and that he is a more or less friendly person. Kate Christensen, who was somehow cognizant of last year’s skirmish, remarked, “But you’re both such nice guys!” I assured Ms. Christensen that she was wrong. Lev and I enjoyed a Moriarty-Holmes relationship. We were both gentlemen and we didn’t wish to unleash our fury upon an unsuspecting crowd.
Is this the end of the Lev-Ed loggerjam? Well, who is to say? Mr. Grossman appears on the surface to be quietly charming and perhaps just a tad misunderstood. But I still believe him to be made of sturdier stuff and indeed pressed him on this pedantic character quality over twenty minutes of conversation. He took it well.
I slipped away so that Lev would think himself safe. But, of course, I concoct silly and meticulously contrived plans that will be unleashed at a time of my choosing.
Roundup at a Slightly More Reasonable Hour
- For grammarians who like to toe-tap, Vampire Weekend offers the rather pleasant “Oxford Comma.” (via A Different Stripe)
- So was Schumann a depressive or did he just suffer from hemorrhoids?
- Some info on the upcoming Thor movie, which will be directed by Matthew Vaughn. (via The Beat)
- Also from Ms. McDonald: relive 1982 San Diego ComicCon, before it was out of control. You’ve gotta dig Mark Evanier’s groovy collar.
- Conan returns to film!
- The Globe‘s Harvey Blume talks with Doris Lessing. (via Maud)
- But is it a Vogon poet?
- Behold:
Shriek: The Movie . - In Germany, they take their hatred of literary critics quite seriously. (via Orthofer)
- Linda Richards interviews Andrea MacPherson.
- Edward Tufte on Megan Jaegerman’s news graphics. (via Jenny D)
- George Saunders on climate change. (via Laila)
- I’m sorry. Pacino’s a joke now. Nice try though.
- It turns out that a Hartford Courant reporter has been charged with murder.
- Apparently, when interviewing Joyce Carol Oates, it’s important to specify which book you’re talking about. (via Bookninja)
- Kassia Krozser is looking for a fight.
- Jackie Chan doesn’t enjoy making the Rush Hour movies. (via the Other Ed)
- It appears that John Williams is likewiise baffled by how Deborah Solomon remains employed. (via 2 Blowhards)
Roundup at a Strange Hour
- Ron Silliman takes on the metrosexual creature Jon Carroll for his dubious column on poetry.
- So if you like to see David Duchovny getting laid, Californication‘s your show, I suppose. Showtime: No Limits. Why don’t they just call the show Duchovny’s Dick and get it over with?
- Ruben Bolling envisions Cormac McCarthy’s Toy Story 3. (via Rarely Likable)
- I haven’t meticulously examined Adam Gopnik’s lengthy take on PKD yet, but when I do, I hope to offer a lengthy response. There are many things that need to be addressed here.
- Japan purchased 331% more books on phones in 2006. Do e-books have a new future?
- ” all, this book paints a punishingly bleak picture.” Leave it to Janet Maslin to demonstrate all the subtlety of a 16 ton weight’s impact upon a reader’s skull. Please, Maslin, go back to film reviewing. You were good at that.
- Murakami starts writing.
- Pollock doesn’t use pink.
- Levi Asher interviews Katharine Weber.
- Rick Kleffel talks with William Gibson. And here are some reactions to Spook Country. (via Locus)
- Tod Goldberg reads Harry Potter fan fiction.
- Josh Glenn tries to make sense of Hitch’s standards of juvenile literature.
- This year’s British Fantasy Award nominees have left the building.
- In this preposterous article, Arthur C. Brooks argues that adjusting our society for income disparity is unnecessary, because studies show that the level of happiness hasn’t changed since 1972. Obviously, Brooks is unaware that people often prevaricate when asked “How are you doing?” or “Are you happy?” The more interesting question is whether the General Social Survey accounted for this discrepancy. Are people more conformist in 2004 than they were in 1973? And, as such, are they more inclined to say that they are “very happy” when an auspicious surveyor presses them on the subject? Furthermore, by what stretch of the imagination is improving social and financial conditions for all a bad thing? Why does Brooks naively separate opportunity from income inequality? It’s not a matter of being envious, but of ensuring that more people have a chance to live legitimately happy lives. Moving cash around from the haves to the have nots so that more income can be redistributed for the benefit of a society is a start, seeing as how government is currently disinclined to do this.
- UK broadband customers are going to be paying the price for the popularity of online video. Will American providers attempt something similar?
- Why are we so obsessed with Jane Austen’s love life? (via Big Bad Book Blog)
- I’m with Scott. It seems patently absurd to invent bullshit genres around current events. This blog, incidentally, by way of operating presently in August 14, 2007, is a post-9/11, post-Katrina, post-Rove resignation blog. I will do my best to write with angst and importance, but I can’t promise anything.
- Jeff VanderMeer uncovers a few rare Choose Your Own Adventure covers.
- What will be the title of Indiana Jones IV? Why not Indiana Jones and the Threat of Geritol?
- Henry Kisor is pessimistic about the future of literature.
- Between this and the Hitchens review, I really want to know what fumes NYT staffers are inhaling at the new building. Seriously. (via The Gurgling Cod)
