BEA: Podcast Panel Report
Written byPosted on May 18, 2006
Filed Under BEA, Uncategorized
Make no mistake. BookExpo America is an industry convention. If something here looks, feels or breathes cash potential, the men dressed in blue blazers and the well-coiffed and often middle-aged women dressed in conservative skirts rarely extending above the knee will be on it like loyal johns courting a favorite prostitute.
The hell of it is, nobody really knows what they’re doing. Least of all the panelists.
There was no better indication of this then this morning’s disastrous “How to Leverage a Podcast” panel, which Carolyn Kellogg and I (both of us being podcasters and both of us being more than a bit curious about how marketing language sashays with the medium) attended by the slimmest of time margins. A slick-sounding, bearded man by the unlikely name of Tee Morris led the proceedings. Morris, who hadn’t even bothered to don a business suit for this almighty trade show, was the author of Podcasting for Dummies. The room was filled with starry-eyed entrepreneurs looking up at this marketing majordomo and feeling a bit disappointed. He came across as a huckster without a clear plan. Many of the people walked out of the presentation, in large part because Morris’s approach was more “MAKE MONEY FAST!” than any practical summation of how a podcast can generate revenue or what it could do for publishing or how it could be ABOUT something.
In a mystifying move, Morris didn’t really zero in on publishing-based podcasts until forced into topical alignment by the slightly more coherent Rob Simon (the man behind this year’s BEA podcasts), who, rather fittingly, stood behind a podium on a slightly raised dais while Morris gesticulated on the ground floor.
What were, for example, the Battlestar Galactica podcasts? “It’s basically a director’s commentary on demand!” exclaimed Morris.
There were even some crazy gender assertions. “Women are [making podcasts] better than men. They are just keeping quiet about it.”
Morris seemed particularly proud of the way one publishing house (he couldn’t identify whether it was Simon & Schuster or Random House) came specifically to one particular podcast for sponsorship. And he failed to offer a clear plan to the hopeful attendees other than to get podcasts listed on major directories and try and get linked by other sites.
Perhaps intoxicated by the Web 2.0 fervor, Morris tossed all manner of buzz words and catchphrases into the fray.
“Podcasting enhances publishing.”
“Podcasting is the next big thing.”
He even quoted McLuhan’s motto, “The medium is the message.”
Carolyn and I watched slackjawed as Morris fumbled repeatedly, failing to point out the “literary” in “literary podcast.” Despite his unabashed zeal, Morris dodged one fundamental thing that makes podcasts work: the fact that they have an identity that runs counter to the bland conduits of corporate radio. He never suggested once to the podcasting hopefuls that they might learn a few lessons by, say, listening to a few podcasts before making a strike for the mythical cash vein.
And can one really trust a guy who refers to himself in the third person? “If you’ve never heard of Tee Morris until today,” Morris started, “you will eventually.”
Other Morris points of wisdom: “People like that behind-the-scenes stuff!” Who exactly? What constitutes “behind-the-scenes stuff?”
“Podcasts need to be branded!” How?
There was an attempt by Rob Simon at coining a new catchphrase: “Think outside the book.” Apart from the bastardization of a now tired corporate buzz phrase, shouldn’t a publishing-based podcast be thinking very much inside the bok?
Morris also cited Cory Doctorow as an example of a successful podcaster, but failed to note that he also runs Boing Boing, one of the most popular blogs on the planet and that this may have had a bit of a hand in getting people to listen to the podcast.
Morris did have a few good points, such as the idea of using a podcast to reach to the hard-to-reach white male audience in publishing. But even this still limns Morris’s troubling approach, perhaps symptomatic of most of the Web 2.0 panels here: throw heaps of statistics at the crowd and expect them to draw mystifying associations.
Welcome to the publishing industry.
Comments
2 Responses to “BEA: Podcast Panel Report”
Leave a Reply
Books To Jump Up and Down Over
Beyond Heaving Bosoms by Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan. The famed writers behind Smart Bitches, Trashy Books have written a very funny and thoughtful volume about romances, both Old Skool and New Skool. Here is a book that any smug and humorless literary manboy beating his flabby passive chest over Banville or Bolano should probably read pronto, if only for the distant possibility that he might get over himself. While the Choose Your Own Adventure segment at the end caused me to have a very disturbing dream involving Shelley Long (don't ask), Sarah and Candy did have me rethinking many of my own misperceptions when I wasn't busy laughing. They're not afraid to take on the New York Times Bok Review or even the groupthink within certain sectors of the romance community.
Alice Fantastic by Maggie Estep. This wild and highly enjoyable narrative involves two sisters (presumably, the third one was still being rented out by Chekhov), a hippie ex-junkie mother who lives with seventeen dogs, a murder, gambling, and libidinous Hollywood actresses who live in Woodstock. But this is the wonderful Maggie Estep we're talking here. And what seems at first like a quirky yarn becomes something unexpectedly moving about connectivity. What I love about Estep's work is the way that she'll juxtapose an extremely astute observation (now that you mention it, why do cab drivers always have somebody to talk with on the phone past midnight?) with an often outrageous story development.
Generosity by Richard Powers. It doesn't come out until September 29th, but Richard Powers's latest will have anyone committed to books reconsidering their literary fervor. I foresee some animosity from the vanilla critics hostile to idea-driven novels, but book bloggers, YouTube chroniclers, and MFAs would do well to plunge into this chance-taking narrative, which introduces vital questions about what the reader's relationship is with media, scientific dissection, and "creative nonfiction." Are we rats fleeing to happy cities? Or can we find the humanism within the purported plague?
Pieces for the Left Hand by J. Robert Lennon. Lennon is one of the most underrated fiction writers working today. Much as On the Night Plain proved that Lennon had a lot more in the toolbox than heartfelt (and often very funny) suburban satire, this slim but fascinating volume juxtaposes 100 small-town anecdotes -- arranged by category -- in a manner that reads, at times, like Nicholson Baker's passions for minutiae and, at other times, Stewart O'Nan's concern for psychological detail. The result is fiction that makes us wonder about whether one person's subjective view of particulars can entirely be trusted. This book never found a publisher in 2005. But thankfully, Graywolf has released it in the United States, along with Lennon's latest novel, The Castle.
Wonderful World by Javier Calvo. This wonderfully raucous volume has been completely ignored by the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times. But it's probably one of the most delightful reading experiences I've had this year. Calvo cavalierly mashes up multiple genres and manages to mix up familial subtext with larger-than-life, almost cartoonish characters. (Indeed, one might argue that one mobster's penis is a character of its own in this sprawling novel.). This is not an easy thing to pull off, but Calvo makes it work. And it's helped immeasurably by Mara Faye Lethem's idiom-specific translation. (See longer post.)
The Means of Reproduction, Michelle Goldberg This thoughtful book tackles the complicated (and little discussed) subject of reproductive rights from numerous angles, which includes a number of unpleasant but necessary ones. The upshot is that there isn't a quick fix solution for declining birth rates and fundamentalist abuses. Just about every political faction has contributed to the friction. But you'll want to read this book anyway to refamiliarize yourself with the topic, but also to understand just what's occurred during the past several decades to get us where we are today. (See also podcast interview with Goldberg.)
- More on NPR Ombudsman Alicia Shepard's silence from @simonowens here: http://bit.ly/5K6FX 13 mins ago
- NPR bans "torture" to describe interrogation tactics, ombudsman refuses to speak. (Is "torture" the new "genocide"?) http://bit.ly/47jA7h 18 mins ago
- @KateC Are you certain that was the woman's entire story? (And is the policy fair to those who have been looking for work in good faith?) in reply to KateC 20 mins ago
- More updates...
Or send materials to:
315 Flatbush Avenue, #231
Brooklyn, NY 11217
- Will Resurface Later
- The Bat Segundo Show: Hal Niedzviecki II
- Alain de Botton on Responding to Critics
- Alain de Botton Clarifies the Caleb Crain Response
- Despotism (1946)
- Inside BookTour.com: A Q&A With Kevin Smokler
- Dia de los Vivos — Flower Parade 2009
- Alice Hoffman: The Most Immature Writer of Her Generation
- The History of Verizon, Part Three (September to October 2000)
- Hoaxes Are Still Possible in the Internet Age
I’ve been bothered by what I’ve seen online about Tee Morris, and this doesn’t surprise me one bit. The podcasting ventures that he’s involved with are the free-download type, so I’m curious why he was asked to talk about making money at it. I also wonder at his credibility. He’s edited a book called The Fantasy Writer’s Companion, but his own writing credits are cliche-sounding novels from a micropress with bad production values. And, like you say, he throws out trendy buzzwords and phrases without explaining them or putting them in a larger context.
There’s a reek of desperation from the guy, and it turns me off from anything associated with him. He seems entrenched in fandom, and rails against the fact that he’s not published by a large publisher, and it all smacks of juvenile entitlement.
Sorry you had to endure that, man.
Clearly, you didn’t like Tee’s BEA presentation and that’s your call. But “A Concerned Podcaster” took it a bit too far when he questioned Tee’s credibility and tagged him for writing “cliche-sounding novels from a micropress with bad production values.”
Tee’s latest novel was up for two awards this year, the second year in the row. If you haven’t read his books, you can’t comment on them, just like I can’t make remarks about Tee’s BEA performance since I wasn’t there.
And as to the micropress issue — all presses start small. Some die, some grow bigger. Tee’s press has 20+ novels to its credit and each year it gets stronger. Three of their authors were up for national awards this year. You don’t get that with bad production.
How would I know? My latest book was published by that same ‘micro’ press. And the quality? It has topnotch cover art, excellent interior layout and printing and was professionally edited. It stands on par with anything NY puts on the shelf.
If you want to throw sand at Tee, stick to the facts. Otherwise, you’re just being mean spirited.